The first is about the selfish, unfeeling use of others and assesses interpersonal relationships and affect or mood. Originally having 16 items, the Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised has 20 and it is divided into two broad categories. The results are considered sufficiently important that it is recommended that two clinicians perform the test independently and the results averaged in order to give a more reliable assessment. As well as this they need to be trained in the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised. These people should have degrees in medical or behavioral science, be certified to diagnose mental disorders (e.g., psychiatrists and psychologists) and be experienced in working with criminal populations. The results of this test have far-reaching implications for the patient, and so its use is confined to a small group of people. Therefore, it is also being used to assess the probability of a criminal re-offending as well as determining the length of sentence and whether or not treatment is advised. It is also considered to be the most accurate predictor of violent behavior that we have. It is a complex clinical tool that is only used by experts in the field. We offer recommendations for new web-based training procedures.The Robert Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised is considered by clinicians and researchers worldwide to be the 'gold standard' in assessing psychopathy. Real-world PCL-R assessments typically involve a face-to-face interview and much more extensive collateral information. We temper these conclusions by noting that scoring standardized videotaped case studies does not allow the rater to interact directly with the offender. Therefore, despite low reliability estimates for individual items, Total scores and factor scores can be reliably scored among trained raters. Overall, 3 major conclusions can be drawn from the results: (a) reliability of individual PCL-R items largely fell below any appropriate standards while the estimates for Total PCL-R scores and factor scores were good (but not excellent) (b) the cases representing individuals with high psychopathy scores showed better reliability than did the cases of individuals in the moderate to low PCL-R score range and (c) there was a high degree of variability among raters however, rater specific differences had no consistent effect on scoring the PCL-R. All raters completed PCL-R training at some point between 19 and subsequently provided complete coding for the same 6 practice cases. The goal of the current study was to assess the interrater reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) among a large sample of trained raters (N = 280).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |